Unrevealing the Mesopotamian Jewish Arabic Dialect Continuum
Semitic Studies
15.10.2025
For centuries, Jews in the Tigris–Euphrates region spoke a mosaic of Judeo-Arabic dialects, all belonging to the qǝltu branch of Mesopotamian Arabic. This project investigates the extent of variation among these dialects and whether they form a linguistic continuum. It also examines possible historical links with Jewish Arabic varieties in the northern Levant, offering new insights into the region’s patterns of
linguistic change, migration, and community identity.
Dr. Assaf Bar-Moshe
Bildquelle: private
A native speaker of the Jewish dialect of Urfa with Dr. Assaf Bar-Moshe
Bildquelle: Assaf Bar-Moshe
Map of Jewish dialects in Mesopotamia color-coded by dialect families.
Bildquelle: Assaf Bar-Moshe on Google Maps
Who we are
Dr. Assaf Bar-Moshe is a linguist at the Institute of Semitic Studies (FU Berlin) specializing in Arabic dialectology and Jewish languages. His past work examined the Jewish dialects of Baghdad and ˁĀna, and his current DFG-funded research expands this to a comparative analysis of Judeo-Arabic dialects across Mesopotamia.
How we work
Researching Judeo-Arabic dialects today is uniquely challenging. Most native speakers left their communities, mostly to Israel, over seventy years ago, and few remain proficient. Many informants were children when they emigrated and have not used the dialects regularly since. As a result, these dialects cannot be documented through recordings alone. Instead, key grammatical features are identified and reconstructed through comparative analysis with better-documented and related dialects, allowing for a more accurate linguistic portrait despite the fragmented data.
Which results are most important
The study reveals not just linguistic features but also the social and historical dynamics of Jewish communities in the region. A striking example is the Jewish dialect of Mosul, which shows greater similarity to Anatolian dialects than to the Muslim dialect of the same city. This suggests that the Jewish community preserved older linguistic features while maintaining social boundaries from the surrounding Muslim population.
What remains to be examined
With the fieldwork and individual dialect analyses largely complete, the next phase focuses on comparative analysis and drawing broader historical and sociolinguistic conclusions across the dialect landscape.






