Sakikkû Tafel 19/20 A VAT 14555 + W. 17360l + W.17360z (spB)
Kopie: VAT 14555: LKU, Tfl. XXIX, Nr. 92; W. 17360l: Falkenstein, A., TDP II, Pl. LXVII; W.17360z: Cavigneaux (1996), 211, Nr. 320; Rekonstruktion und virtueller Join: BAD, 454
Veröffentlichung: VAT 14555: TDP I, 244-246; BAD, 227; Scurlock (2014), 176-177/179-180
Position: 1‘-17‘
Vorderseite
1‘ A_1‘ [DIŠ …] x […]
2‘ A_2‘ [DIŠ … A ana] ⸢TU₅^?⸣ ⸢ma⸣-[gal URU₄^? ...]
3’ A_3’ [DIŠ ...] x x [...] x ma [x x (x)]
4’ A_4’ [DIŠ ...] x x ŠUB ⸢ŠUB/su^?⸣ [... ana^?] ⸢GIG⸣ DU₁₀-⸢ab⸣ TIN [x (x)]
5‘ A_5‘ [DIŠ … ŠA₃].⸢MEŠ⸣-šu₂ eb-ṭu₂ ⸢SIG₇⸣ ⸢ŠUB-u₂⸣ ⸢ŠU⸣ ⸢^d⸣[x (x)]
6‘ A_6‘ [DIŠ …] ⸢TUK^?⸣.MEŠ-ši ⸢ŠU⸣ ^dx [x (x)]
7’ A_7’ [DIŠ ... A] ana NAG URU₄.MEŠ ŠU ^d[DIM₁₁.ME^? (x)]
8’ A_8’ [DIŠ ...] ⸢KUM₂/SED^?⸣.MEŠ ŠU ^d⸢DIM₁₁⸣.[ME (x)]
9’ A_9’ [DIŠ KUM₂(-im) u SED A] ⸢ana⸣ TU₅^!?(šu šu₂ šum₂) ⸢UL₄.GAL⸣ ⸢URU₄.MEŠ⸣ ⸢ŠU^?⸣ ^dDIM₁₁.ME : ^dXXX x [(x)]
#if the reading TU₅ is correct, which has been proposed in BAD 227 without question mark, the form is at least to be marked as corrupt since TU₅ is usually written ŠU-NAGA
10’ A_10’ [DIŠ ... i^?]-bal-luṭ ŠU ^d⸢DIM₃⸣.[ME (x)]
11’ A_11’ [DIŠ ... IR] ⸢NU⸣ TUK ŠU ^dXXX TIN : KI.MIN ana GAL <u> ⸢TUR⸣ ⸢DIŠ⸣-[ma]
12’ A_12’ [DIŠ ... UMUŠ/DAB^?] ⸢GIG⸣-su KUR₂.KUR₂-ir UD 5.KAM₂ ŠU ^dXXX [x (x)]
13’ A_13’ [DIŠ ... DAB]-⸢su⸣ KUR₂.KUR₂-ir : UMUŠ-šu₂ KUR₂.KUR₂-ir ⸢ŠU⸣ ^dXXX [x (x)]
14‘ A_14‘ [DIŠ … da]-⸢bab^?-šu₂⸣ KUR₂.KUR₂-ir UD 3.KAM₂ GIG ⸢ŠU⸣ ^d[x]
15‘ A_15‘ [DIŠ … IGI.MIN-šu₂] ⸢ur⸣-ru-pa UD 12.KAM₂ ⸢ŠU⸣ ^dNIN.GIR₂.[SU]
16‘ A_16‘ [DIŠ … IGI.MEŠ]-⸢šu₂⸣ ur-ru-pu₂ ina UD 1.KAM₂ 2-⸢šu₂⸣ [LA₂-šu₂^?] ⸢ŠU^?⸣ ⸢^d?DIM₁₁.ME^?⸣ [x]
17‘ A_17‘ [DIŠ … ZI-bi u] ⸢DUR₂-ab⸣ UD ⸢59.KAM₂⸣ ⸢GIG⸣ ⸢ŠU⸣ [^ddil-bat (…)]
(Bruch)
Rückseite
(Bruch)
A_{rev 1‘} […] x x […]
A_2‘ […] x […]
A_3‘ […] x ⸢ud?⸣ [...]
A_4’ [...] x [...]
A_5’ [...] (x) [...]
A_6’ [...] x ⸢ka^?⸣ x (x) [...]
A_7’ [...] x E₂ [...]
A_8’ [...] x x [...]
#this fragmentary passage may belong to the menological or hemerological passages in 19/20:84’-99’
(Bruch)